The uniqueness and value distribution of meromorphic functions with different types of differential-difference polynomials sharing a small function IM

  • H. R. Jayarama Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Sapthagiri NPS University, Bengaluru, India
  • C. N. Chaithra Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Sapthagiri NPS University, Bengaluru, India
  • S. H. Naveenkumar Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Presidency University, Bangalore, India
Keywords: sharing value, small function, nonlinear differential polynomial, meromorphic function

Abstract

This paper delves into the uniqueness of finite-order meromorphic functions \(f(z)\) and \(g(z)\) over the extended complex plane, particularly when these functions share a small function \(a(z)\) under specific conditions. The study reveals new insights with significant applications, such as classifying different complexes within \(\mathbb{C}\) based on their uniqueness. The primary goal is to explore the uniqueness of meromorphic functions that share a small function \(a(z)\) in the sense of IM (ignoring multiplicities) while constrained by finite order, alongside certain types of differential-difference polynomials. We focus on two non-constant meromorphic functions \(f(z)\) and \(g(z)\) of finite order, under the assumption that a small function \(a(z)\), relative to \(f(z)\), plays a crucial role in the analysis. The investigation centers on the uniqueness properties of a~specific type of differential-difference polynomial of the form \([f^{n}P[f]H(z,f)]\), where \(P[f]\) is a~differential polynomial of \(f(z)\) and \(H(z, f)\) is a difference polynomial of \(f(z)\), both defined in the equations \(\eqref{*}\) and \(\eqref{**}\), respectively. Importantly, these polynomials do not vanish identically and do not share common zeros or poles with either \(f(z)\) or \(g(z)\). The paper establishes conditions on several parameters, including \(k\), \(n\), \(\overline{d}(P)\), \(\Psi\), \(Q\), \(t\), and \(\xi\), under which the shared value properties between \(f(z)\) and \(g(z)\) lead to two possible outcomes: either \(f(z)\) is a constant multiple of \(g(z)\), or \(f(z)\) and \(g(z)\) satisfy a specific algebraic difference equation. This result contributes to a~deeper understanding of the relationship between shared values and the structural properties of meromorphic functions. As an application, the paper extends several previous results on meromorphic functions, including those by Dyavanal and M. M. Mathai, published in the Ukr. Math. J. (2019). Furthermore, by citing a particular example, we demonstrate that the established results hold true only under specific cases, highlighting the precision of the theorem. Finally, we offer a more compact version of the main theorem as an enhancement, providing a~refined perspective on the uniqueness problem in the context of meromorphic functions.

Author Biographies

H. R. Jayarama, Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Sapthagiri NPS University, Bengaluru, India

Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Sapthagiri NPS University, Bengaluru, India

C. N. Chaithra, Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Sapthagiri NPS University, Bengaluru, India

Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Sapthagiri NPS University, Bengaluru, India

S. H. Naveenkumar, Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Presidency University, Bangalore, India

Department of Mathematics, School of Engineering and Technology, Presidency University, Bangalore, India

References

W.K. Hayman, Meromorphic functions, V.2, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1964.

I. Laine, Nevanlinna theory and complex differential equations, V.15, Walter de Gruyter, 1993.

R.G. Halburd, Difference analogue of the lemma on the logarithmic derivative with applications to difference equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 314 (2006), 477–487.

G. Haldar, Uniqueness of meromorphic functions concerning kth derivatives and difference operators, Palest. J. M., 11 (2022), 20–35.

G. Haldar, Uniqueness of entire functions whose difference polynomials share a polynomial with finite weight, Cubo (Temuco), 24 (2022), 167–186.

G. Haldar, Value sharing results for generalized shifts of entire functions, J. Indian Math. Soc., 90 (2023), 53–66.

M.B. Ahamed, G. Haldar, Uniqueness of difference-differential polynomials of meromorphic functions sharing a small function IM, J. Anal., 30 (2022), 147–174.

G. Haldar, Uniqueness of entire functions concerning differential-difference polynomials sharing small functions, J. Anal., 30 (2022), 785–806.

Xiao-Guang Qi, Lian-Zhong Yang, Kai Liu, Uniqueness and periodicity of meromorphic functions concerning the difference operator, Comput. Math. Appl., 60 (2010), 1739–1746.

Xiao-Min Li, Wen-Li Li, Hong-Xun Yi, Zhi-Tao Wen, Uniqueness theorems for entire functions whose difference polynomials share a meromorphic function of a smaller order, Ann. Polon. Math., 2 (2011), 111–127.

Kai Liu, Xinling Liu, Ting-Bin Cao, Value distributions and uniqueness of difference polynomials, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2011 (2011), Article: 234215, 1–12.

Kai Liu, Xinling Liu, Ting-Bin Cao, Some results on zeros and uniqueness of difference-differential polynomials, Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities, 27 (2012), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-012-2795-x

R.S. Dyavanal, M.M. Mathai, Uniqueness of difference-differential polynomials of meromorphic functions, Ukr. Math. J., 71 (2019), 1032–1043.

W. Bergweiler, J.K. Langley, Zeros of differences of meromorphic functions, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 142 (2007), 133–147.

Yik-Man Chiang, Shao-Ji Feng, On the Nevanlinna characteristic of $f(z+eta)$ and difference equations in the complex plane, Ramanujan J., 6 (2008), 105–129.

Xudan Luo, Wei-Chuan L, Value sharing results for shifts of meromorphic functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 377 (2011), 441–449.

Hong Xun Yi, Uniqueness of meromorphic functions and a question of C.C. Yang, Complex Variables Theory Appl., 14 (1990), 169–176.

Chung-Chun Yang, Xinhou Hua, Uniqueness and value-sharing of meromorphic functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 22 (1997), 395–406.

A. Banerjee, Meromorphic functions sharing one value, Int. J. Math. Sci., 2005 (2005), 3587–3598.

Hong-Xun Yi, Meromorphic functions that share three sets, Kodai Math. J., 20 (1997), 22–32.

P.W. Harina, V. Husna, Results on uniqueness of product of certain type of difference polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math., 31 (2021), 67–74.

H.R. Jayarama, S.S. Bhoosnurmath, C.N. Chaithra, S.H. Naveenkumar, Uniqueness of meromorphic functions with nonlinear differential polynomials sharing a small function IM, Mat. Stud., 60 (2023), 145–161.

H.R. Jayarama, S.H. Naveenkumar, C.N. Chaithra, On the uniqueness of meromorphic functions of certain types of non-linear differential polynomials share a small function, Adv. Stud.: Euro-Tbil. Math. J., 16 (2023), 21–37.

C.N. Chaithra, H.R. Jayarama, S.H. Naveenkumar, S. Rajeshwari, Unicity of meromorphic function with their shift operator sharing small function, South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci., 19 (2023), 123–136.

R.G. Halburd, R.J. Korhonen, Difference analogue of the lemma on the logarithmic derivative with applications to difference equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 314 (2006), 477–487.

Y.M. Chiang, S.J. Feng, On the Nevanlinna characteristic of $f(z+eta)$ and difference equations in the complex plane, Ramanujan J., 16 (2008), 105–129.

R.G. Halburd, R.J. Korhonen, Nevanlinna theory for the difference operator, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 31 (2006), 463–478.

A.Z. Mohon’ko, The Nevanlinna characteristics of certain meromorphic functions, Teorija Funkcij Functional Analiz and ikh Prilozenije (Kharkiv), 14 (1971), 83–87.

Published
2024-12-13
How to Cite
Jayarama, H. R., Chaithra, C. N., & Naveenkumar, S. H. (2024). The uniqueness and value distribution of meromorphic functions with different types of differential-difference polynomials sharing a small function IM. Matematychni Studii, 62(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.30970/ms.62.2.141-154
Section
Articles